PricingAboutBlogLog in
Elani
Log inGet started
PricingAboutBlogLog in

Solutions

  • For Founders
  • For CEOs
  • For Investors
  • For Personal Use

Product

  • Features
  • Pricing

Resources

  • Blog
  • About

Compare

  • vs Motion
  • vs Superhuman
  • vs ChatGPT
  • View All

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Socials

  • Follow @elani_ai on X
© 2026 Elani, Inc. Built to stay ahead.
January 19, 2026

The Economics of Attention: Why We Budget Your AI's Focus

Why infinite context windows aren't the answer. How Elani's Budgeter uses intelligent constraints to improve agent reasoning and reduce noise.

There is a prevailing myth in the AI industry: "If we just make the context window bigger, the model will understand everything."

We've seen context windows grow from 4k to 128k, to 1 million tokens and beyond. The promise is seductive—feed your entire company's history into the model, and it will perfectly recall that one Slack message from three years ago.

But in practice, this fails. It fails for the same reason a human executive fails when you dump 10,000 unread emails on their desk: Information Saturation.

When you flood an LLM with noise, its reasoning capabilities degrade. It gets "distracted" by irrelevant details. It hallucinates connections that aren't there.

At Elani, we take a different approach. We don't just dump data into the model. We budget its attention.

The Cost of Curiosity

Every time an AI agent "reads" an email, two costs are incurred:

  1. Financial Cost: Input tokens cost money.
  2. Cognitive Cost: More noise reduces the probability of correct reasoning.

To manage this, we built a core component called the Budgeter, part of our Ingestion V2 pipeline.

Inside the Ingestion Pipeline

Most simple RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) systems work like a vacuum cleaner: suck up everything, index it, and hope for the best.

Elani's ingestion pipeline acts more like a triage nurse. It consists of distinct stages designed to filter noise before it reaches the expensive reasoning layers.

1. Source Fetch (The Scan)

First, our scheduler-worker triggers a scan. We fetch metadata—headers, subjects, timestamps—but not the full body content. This is cheap and fast.

2. The Extraction Gate

This is where the magic happens. The ExtractionGate stage uses lightweight heuristics and cheaper models to ask a simple question: "Is this item likely to contain value?"

It looks at:

  • Sender Reputation: Is this from a key stakeholder or a newsletter bot?
  • Thread Velocity: Are people replying quickly?
  • Semantic Relevance: Does the subject line map to an active project?

3. The Budgeter

The Budgeter enforces strict limits. Even if 500 emails look "interesting," we might only have the "budget" (time/compute) to deeply process the top 50 right now.

The logic resides in packages/shared-utils/src/orchestrators/ingestion-v2/budgeter.ts. It prioritizes items based on urgency and importance, ensuring that we process the critical few rather than the mediocre many.

// Conceptual logic of the Budgeter
if (candidate.score < threshold || currentSpend > dailyBudget) {
  return "defer"; // Save for later or discard
}
return "process";

4. Body Fetch & Extraction

Only when an item passes the Gate and the Budgeter do we spend the resources to fetch the full body and run our ExtractionClassifier. This deep-read extracts entities, dates, and action items.

Less is More

By aggressively filtering the input, we achieve something counter-intuitive: Better output.

Because Elani is only reasoning about high-signal data, her "mental workspace" is clean. She connects the dots between the CEO's email and the Q3 roadmap because she isn't distracted by the 4,000 automated notifications in between.

The Future is Curated

As we move into 2026, the challenge for AI won't be accessing information—it will be ignoring it.

We are building Elani to be the best at ignoring the noise, so she (and you) can focus on the signal.


Previous PostTrust is an Engineering Metric: Designing for Progressive AutonomyNext PostThe Bottleneck is You: Moving from Generation to Decision